Journal of Financial Econometrics Advance Access published online on August 12, 2005
Journal of Financial Econometrics, doi:10.1093/jjfinec/nbi025
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. We examine tests for jumps based on recent asymptotic results; we interpret the tests as Hausman-type tests. Monte Carlo evidence suggests that the daily ratio z-statistic has appropriate size, good power, and good jump detection capabilities revealed by the confusion matrix comprised of jump classification probabilities. We identify a pitfall in applying the asymptotic approximation over an entire sample. Theoretical and Monte Carlo analysis indicates that microstructure noise biases the tests against detecting jumps, and that a simple lagging strategy corrects the bias. Empirical work documents evidence for jumps that account for 7% of stock market price variance.
Revised March 17, 2005
Accepted July 4, 2005
Article
The Relative Contribution of Jumps to Total Price Variance
1 Duke University
George Tauchen, E-mail: george.tauchen{at}duke.edu
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Liu and J. M. Maheu Are There Structural Breaks in Realized Volatility? J. Financial Econometrics, July 1, 2008; 6(3): 326 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Forsberg and E. Ghysels Why Do Absolute Returns Predict Volatility So Well? J. Financial Econometrics, January 1, 2007; 5(1): 31 - 67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Canopius Practitioners' Corner J. Financial Econometrics, January 1, 2006; 4(1): 161 - 166. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
