Skip Navigation


Journal of Financial Econometrics Advance Access originally published online on September 28, 2006
Journal of Financial Econometrics 2006 4(4):671-675; doi:10.1093/jjfinec/nbl006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
4/4/671    most recent
nbl006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Canopius, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow C13 - Estimation
Right arrow F31 - Foreign Exchange
Right arrow G11 - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
Right arrow G13 - Contingent Pricing; Futures Pricing
Right arrow G15 - International Financial Markets
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Practitioners’ Corner

Adam Canopius
     a.canopius@cirano.qc.ca

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

A fundamental issue in international portfolio diversification relates to the evolution over time of the correlations and variances of assets. If correlations were to increase in bad times or when markets were highly volatile, the diversification benefits would certainly be compromised when most needed. However, statistical complications arise in addressing the issue. The usual approach to test whether correlation changes during bear period conditions on observed ex post realized low market returns. Yet care must exercised in testing such a proposition, because correlation is a complex function of returns. Boyer, Gibson, and Loretan (1999)Go show that conditional correlation is highly nonlinear in the level of returns on which it is conditioned. One cannot conclude that the true correlation is changing simply by looking at the difference between the values obtained conditioning, for example, on low or high values of one variable or both variables. The distribution of conditional correlation under . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?