Least Squares Predictions and Mean-Variance Analysis
CEMFI, CEPR, and LSE FMG
Address correspondence to Enrique Sentana, Casado del Alisal 5, 28014 Madrid, Spain, or e-mail: sentana{at}cemfi.es.
We compare the Sharpe ratios of traders who combine one riskless and one risky asset following (i) buy and hold strategies; (ii) timing strategies with forecasts from simple; or (iii) multiple regressions; and (iv) passive allocations of (i) and (ii) with mean-variance optimizers. We show that (iv) implicitly uses the linear forecasting rule that maximizes the Sharpe ratio of managed portfolios, but the remaining rankings are unclear. We also suggest generalized method of moments (GMM) estimators to make (iv) operational and evaluate their significance with spanning tests. Finally, we characterize the equivalence between (iii) and (iv), and propose moment tests to assess it.
KEYWORDS: delegated portofolio management, financial forecasting, portfolio performance evaluation, Sharpe ratios, spanning tests
Received March 1, 2004; revised October 14, 2004; accepted October 21, 2004
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Y. Campbell and S. B. Thompson Predicting Excess Stock Returns Out of Sample: Can Anything Beat the Historical Average? Rev. Financ. Stud., July 1, 2008; 21(4): 1509 - 1531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
