Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hein, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Westfall, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Financial Econometrics Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 451-471
Journal of Financial Econometrics, Vol. 2, No. 3, © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved.

Improving Tests of Abnormal Returns by Bootstrapping the Multivariate Regression Model with Event Parameters

Scott E. Hein
     Texas Tech University

Peter Westfall
     Texas Tech University

Address correspondence to Scott Hein, Jerry S. Rawls College of Business, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409-2101, or e-mail: odhen{at}ba.ttu.edu.

Parametric dummy variable-based tests for event studies using multivariate regression are not robust to nonnormality of the residual, even for arbitrarily large sample sizes. Bootstrap alternatives are described, investigated, and compared for cases where there are nonnormalities, and cross-sectional and time-series dependencies. Independent bootstrapping of residual vectors from the multivariate regression model controls type I error rates in the presence of cross-sectional correlation, and surprisingly, even in the presence of time-series dependence structures. The proposed methods not only improve upon parametric methods, but also allow development of new and powerful event study tests for which there is no parametric counterpart.

KEYWORDS: bootstrap, cross-sectional correlation, event parameter estimation, event study, significance level, simulation

Received June 10, 2003; revised February 2, 2004; accepted April 26, 2004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.